|
EU
Information >>
EU Activities >>>
Economic and Monetary
Affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EU member
governments run their economies according to similar
principles of economic management. They coordinate their
policies in order to deliver steady growth, more jobs and a
competitive economy across the EU, one which will at the same
time preserve the European social model and protect the
environment. |
|
|
All EU member states are part of
economic and monetary union (EMU), whose purpose is to
integrate the economies of EU countries more effectively. The
roadmap for spurring growth and creating jobs in a socially
cohesive and environmentally responsible Union is the
‘Integrated Guidelines Package’ for the period 2005 to 2008
adopted in July 2005.
This package represents a comprehensive strategy of
macroeconomic, microeconomic and employment policies. Member
States draw up national reform programmes within this
framework, using the tax and social welfare policy mix they
think best suits national circumstances. In implementing the
guidelines, importance is attached to the involvement of
regional and local government, and civil society.
Twelve of the 25 member states have taken integration a
major step further by adopting the same currency, the euro:
Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland,
Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.
The euro benefits individuals and business. Individuals save
money by not having to change money when travelling within the
euro area. Consumers can compare prices more readily, and this
promotes price competition. They pay less to transfer money
across borders. Businesses reap these same benefits and more.
Other countries will more readily accept invoices in euro than
most of its predecessor currencies, thus reducing their
foreign exchange risk. |
|
[
TOP ] |
|
All EMU members are eligible to adopt the euro, but Denmark
and the United Kingdom have opted to remain outside the euro
for the time being, and Poland and Sweden have no target date
for joining. Estonia, Lithuania and Slovenia, on the other
hand, envisage adopting the euro in 2007, followed by Cyprus,
Latvia and Malta in 2008, Slovakia in 2009, the Czech Republic
and Hungary in 2010. In taking their decision and running
their economies in a way which meets the entry criteria, these
countries weigh the disadvantages (less control over their
inflation, interest and exchange rates) against the likely
benefits – which include having the same currency as major
trading partners, greater credibility in international
financial markets and, consequently, greater flows of
investment.
The entry criteria for the euro include two years of exchange
rate stability before joining. This is achieved through
membership of the ‘Exchange Rate Mechanism’ (ERM), which keeps
fluctuations between the euro and the member currencies within
pre-defined limits. Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta,
the Slovak Republic and Slovenia have already joined the ERM.
Apart from exchange rate stability, there are four other
criteria for adopting the euro. These relate to interest
rates, the budget deficit, the inflation rate, and the
debt-to-GDP ratio. |
|
[
TOP ] |
|
The disciplines of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) keep
economic developments in the EU, and in the euro-area
countries in particular, broadly synchronised. They prevent
member states from taking policy measures which would unduly
benefit their own economies at the expense of other EU
countries.
A key principle of the Pact is the rule that all member
states keep their budgets close to balance or in surplus. The
twin anchors of the pact are the rules that the deficit must
not exceed 3% of gross domestic product (GDP) and that the
debt-to-GDP ratio should not be more than 60%. Member states
are expect to create a cushion against the possibility of
future deficits by putting more money aside in the ‘good
times’ when budgets are close to or in surplus and of reducing
government debt to the threshold level.
A revision in March 2005 based on the first five years of
experience of the Pact left the levels of the twin anchors
unchanged, but introduced greater flexibility in exceeding the
deficit threshold in hard economic times or to finance
investment in structural improvements to the economy. It also
gave member states longer to reverse their excessive deficits.
Ultimately, if they do not bring their economies back into
line, corrective measures, or even fines, can be imposed.
The European Court of Justice is the ultimate arbiter of how
the Pact should be interpreted
chnical assistance to Egypt to eradicate a pest which
threatened its vital potato exports to the EU, and many more. |
|
[
TOP ] |
|
One of the European Commission’s jobs is to assess whether
each member state’s economic policy is in line with the EU's
agreed objectives – economic, social and environmental - and
to provide early warnings if it believes a deficit is becoming
abnormally high or that some other SGP rule is about to be
breached.
Each year, member states provide the Commission with detailed
information on their economic policies and the state of their
public finances. Euro-area countries provide this information
in ‘stability programmes’. Other member states do so in the
form of ‘convergence programmes’. The convergence programmes
contain one element not needed in the stability programmes,
i.e. information on how these economies measure up against the
criteria which would apply if they wanted to join the euro. |
|
[
TOP ] |
|
When the euro was launched in 1999, the European Central
Bank (ECB) took over full responsibility for monetary policy
throughout the euro area. This includes setting benchmark
interest rates and managing the euro area’s foreign exchange
reserves.
The ECB also has the job of ensuring that payments move
smoothly across all EU borders, not just within the euro area,
and is the hub of a real-time network for large payments
transactions, known as TARGET, which helps EU financial
markets work more efficiently.
The ECB and the Commission are working jointly on a Single
Euro Payments Area (SEPA). This will make virtually all forms
of cross-border euro payment faster and no more expensive than
domestic payments by 2010. At the moment, only credit
transfers up to €50 000 are treated like domestic payments and
it is virtually impossible to make some types of payment (e.g.
direct debits) cross-border. This will change no later than
2010 thanks to the SEPA, bringing down costs for everyone from
large companies to parents wanting to send money regularly to
students at a university. |
|
[
TOP ] |
|
|
|
|